Dokumento detalye

I-print at i-save

Maging sanhi

Decision No. 116/12 I

Petsa

2012

Buod

The employer appeals the June 28, 2010 decision of Appeals Resolution Officer (ARO) D. McParland. The ARO allowed the worker entitlement for occupational asthma and corresponding Loss of Earnings (LOE) benefits and a Non-Economic Loss (NEL) assessment to determine the quantum of permanent impairment benefits. She also removed the costs of the NEL award from the employer’s cost statement.

The employer’s appeal is allowed.The worker does not have entitlement for occupational asthma.

Pangalan ng Hukuman

Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal

Kalakip

Connections



  • Decsion No. 116/12 I (http://unik.caij.qc.ca/default.aspx?&unikid=en/on/onwsiat/doc/2012/2012onwsiat259/2012onwsiat259)


  • DECISION NO. 116/12 (http://unik.caij.qc.ca/default.aspx?&unikid=en/on/onwsiat/doc/2012/2012onwsiat2220/2012onwsiat2220)

Pang-ekonomiyang sektor

Agriculture and horticulture workers

Geographical kaugnayan

Ontario