Detalles del documento

Imprima y guarde

Causa

Decision No. 116/12 I

Fecha

2012

Resumen

The employer appeals the June 28, 2010 decision of Appeals Resolution Officer (ARO) D. McParland. The ARO allowed the worker entitlement for occupational asthma and corresponding Loss of Earnings (LOE) benefits and a Non-Economic Loss (NEL) assessment to determine the quantum of permanent impairment benefits. She also removed the costs of the NEL award from the employer’s cost statement.

The employer’s appeal is allowed.The worker does not have entitlement for occupational asthma.

Nombre de la Corte

Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal

Archivos adjuntos

Conexiones



  • Decsion No. 116/12 I (http://unik.caij.qc.ca/default.aspx?&unikid=en/on/onwsiat/doc/2012/2012onwsiat259/2012onwsiat259)


  • DECISION NO. 116/12 (http://unik.caij.qc.ca/default.aspx?&unikid=en/on/onwsiat/doc/2012/2012onwsiat2220/2012onwsiat2220)

Los sectores económicos

Agriculture and horticulture workers

Relevancia geográfica

Ontario