Logo en Global Donate now

GlobalChange

Document Details

 

Print and save

Case

Decision No. 116/12 I

Date

2012

Abstract

The employer appeals the June 28, 2010 decision of Appeals Resolution Officer (ARO) D. McParland. The ARO allowed the worker entitlement for occupational asthma and corresponding Loss of Earnings (LOE) benefits and a Non-Economic Loss (NEL) assessment to determine the quantum of permanent impairment benefits. She also removed the costs of the NEL award from the employer’s cost statement.

The employer’s appeal is allowed.The worker does not have entitlement for occupational asthma.

Court name

Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal

File Attachments

Links



  • Decsion No. 116/12 I (http://unik.caij.qc.ca/default.aspx?&unikid=en/on/onwsiat/doc/2012/2012onwsiat259/2012onwsiat259)


  • DECISION NO. 116/12 (http://unik.caij.qc.ca/default.aspx?&unikid=en/on/onwsiat/doc/2012/2012onwsiat2220/2012onwsiat2220)

Economic sectors

Agriculture and horticulture workers

Geographical focuses

Ontario